2026 Santa Cruz Blur C TR vs 2025 Juliana Wilder TR
The L is the Juliana Wilder TR size closest to your XL Santa Cruz Blur C TR. We match frame stack and reach. This is a geometry comparison, not a fit recommendation; stem, spacers, handlebars and saddle setup also affect your riding position.
What changes on the Juliana Wilder TR
Compared with the Santa Cruz Blur C TR in XL, the Juliana Wilder TR in L places the top of the head tube 14 mm lower and 25 mm further back, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 33 mm shorter, which can contribute to quicker direction changes.
- Frame stack
- −15 mm
- Lower front end
- Frame reach
- −26 mm
- Shorter frame reach
- Wheelbase
- −33 mm
- Shorter: quicker to change direction
- Head angle
- ±0.0°
- About the same head angle
- Chainstays
- n/a
- One of the bikes has no number for this
The two frames
Only the Santa Cruz Blur C TR is drawn. The Juliana Wilder TR numbers we have for size L are missing the chainstay length.
Geometry side by side
| Measurement | Santa Cruz Blur C TR XL | Juliana Wilder TR L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | 483 | 457.5 | −26 mm |
| Stack | 621 | 606.5 | −15 mm |
| Head tube angle | 67.1 | 67.1 | ±0.0° |
| Seat tube angle | 74.8 | 74.9 | +0.1° |
| Effective top tube | 652 | 621.4 | −31 mm |
| Chainstay length | 438 | not listed | |
| Wheelbase | 1216 | 1183.2 | −33 mm |
| BB drop | 33 | 32.9 | −0 mm |
| BB height | 339 | 339.6 | +1 mm |
| Standover | 750 | 745.4 | −5 mm |
| Seat tube length | 520 | 470 | −50 mm |
| Head tube length | 125 | 110 | −15 mm |
Differences are the Juliana Wilder TR minus the Santa Cruz Blur C TR. Full charts: 2026 Santa Cruz Blur C TR, 2025 Juliana Wilder TR.
Where each sits in its class
Santa Cruz Blur C TRJuliana Wilder TR
Each bike is ranked against the other trail bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.
Know what is on every bike.
Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.
Explore the app
