Quiver

2026 Santa Cruz Blur C TR vs 2025 Juliana Wilder TR

The Juliana Wilder TR size closest to your M is the M. Compare the M instead

What changes on the Juliana Wilder TR

Compared with the Santa Cruz Blur C TR in M, the Juliana Wilder TR in L places the top of the head tube 10 mm higher and 20 mm further forward, relative to the bottom bracket. Its wheelbase is 26 mm longer, which can contribute to stability at speed.

Frame stack
+10 mm
Higher front end
Frame reach
+20 mm
Longer frame reach
Wheelbase
+26 mm
Longer: steadier at speed
Head angle
±0.0°
About the same head angle
Chainstays
n/a
One of the bikes has no number for this

The two frames

2026 Santa Cruz Blur C TR (M)The Santa Cruz Blur C TR frame drawn to scale.J 1157

Only the Santa Cruz Blur C TR is drawn. The Juliana Wilder TR numbers we have for size L are missing the chainstay length.

Geometry side by side

MeasurementSanta Cruz Blur C TR MJuliana Wilder TR LDifference
Reach438457.5+20 mm
Stack597606.5+10 mm
Head tube angle67.167.1±0.0°
Seat tube angle75.074.9−0.1°
Effective top tube597621.4+24 mm
Chainstay length433not listed
Wheelbase11571183.2+26 mm
BB drop3332.9−0 mm
BB height340339.6−0 mm
Standover746745.4−1 mm
Seat tube length430470+40 mm
Head tube length100110+10 mm

Differences are the Juliana Wilder TR minus the Santa Cruz Blur C TR. Full charts: 2026 Santa Cruz Blur C TR, 2025 Juliana Wilder TR.

Where each sits in its class

Santa Cruz Blur C TRJuliana Wilder TR

AggressivePositionUpright
CalmSteeringQuick
PlayfulBalancePlanted

Each bike is ranked against the other trail bikes on Quiver, on frame geometry alone. Not your hand position or ride feel.

Know what is on every bike.

Add your bike to Quiver. Keep its parts, setup, and service history together, then share your build.

Explore the app
A Transition Relay build sheet: frame, fork, shock and drivetrainThe Relay’s ride photo galleryThe Relay’s ride spectrum and 2D frame geometryThe garage: five bikes and 99 recorded partsA Specialized Tarmac SL8 road build sheet